Statement by Mississippi Baptist Health Systems, Inc. Regarding Non-profit Litigation
The following is a statement by Robby Channell, Baptist spokesman, regarding Mississippi Baptist Health Systems, Inc. Non-profit Litigation.
(PRWEB) August 15, 2004
The following is a statement by Robby Channell, Baptist spokesman, regarding Mississippi Baptist Health Systems, Inc. Non-profit Litigation:
“We are surprised and disappointed to be named by plaintiffs’ lawyers in this nationwide attack on not-for-profit hospitals. For nearly a century Baptist has compassionately met the healthcare needs and concerns of our community. We have led the way in providing needed healthcare services for the poor in our community – for those who have no resources to pay for the healthcare services provided at Baptist. Charity care is basic to Baptist’s foundation of Christian healing.
We have policies regarding payment from patients who have no insurance but have adequate financial resources to meet their obligation. Additionally, we have responsible collection procedures for those who choose not to pay. Charity care is for those who can not pay.
In order to provide the healthcare services needed in our community, Baptist Medical Center must charge for the resources used in treating patients. If the hospital does not take in enough money to operate, we will eventually have to close our doors.
Our source of income is payment for services rendered. We receive no operating funds from the Mississippi Baptist Convention or through affiliation with any other “Baptist” hospital in the state or region.
In their lawsuit, the plaintiffsÂ’ lawyers have cited to an unrelated and ongoing investigation of Baptist by the Department of Justice regarding Medicare regulations. Baptist has provided information to the Department of Justice and anticipates being able to address and resolve the governmentÂ’s concerns.
We are disappointed plaintiffs’ attorneys have elected this course of action to address a very serious challenge of serving the needs of the uninsured. This lawsuit, disguised as an attempt to change healthcare policy, is simply unnecessary litigation designed to enrich plaintiffs’ lawyers conspiring to attack non-profit faith based healthcare providers.”
# # #
